Tag: movies

Arnold Schwarzenegger: From Bodybuilder to Hollywood Icon

Arnold Schwarzenegger has built one of the most iconic and influential acting careers in modern cinema—transforming from a bodybuilding champion with a thick Austrian accent into one of Hollywood’s most bankable and recognizable stars. His journey is not just impressive; it’s genuinely inspiring.

The first time I saw him was in my granny’s house. It was The Terminator, and despite my protestations, I was brought off to bed. To have nightmares, as it turned out, even after only watching it for a few minutes. It set my imagination alight. What would I do if Terminators were sent back in time to kill me? I decided I’d just die. A few years later, I saw the whole film. I was still impressed, and a little less terrified.

Of course, this was his defining role. As the relentless cyborg assassin, Schwarzenegger delivered a performance that was both chilling and strangely magnetic. His mechanical precision, stoic intensity, and unforgettable line—“I’ll be back”—cemented him as a cinematic legend. What makes this performance so remarkable is how he transformed what could have been a simple villain role into a cultural icon.

But what truly distinguishes Schwarzenegger’s career is his versatility. He didn’t stay confined to action. In Terminator 2: Judgment Day, he added emotional depth and surprising warmth to the same character, proving his growth as a performer. Meanwhile, films like Predator showcased his ability to carry high-stakes ensemble action with intensity and leadership.

Then came comedy—an unexpected but brilliant turn. In Twins, Schwarzenegger displayed impeccable comic timing opposite Danny DeVito, revealing a self-awareness and willingness to parody his own image. He continued that charm in Kindergarten Cop, balancing toughness with heart in a way that broadened his audience and proved he was more than just muscles and catchphrases.

Another standout is Total Recall, where he navigated a complex sci-fi narrative with conviction and physical commitment. His performances often blend physical discipline with a subtle wink of humor—a combination that few action stars have mastered.

What makes Schwarzenegger’s acting career so positive and enduring is not just box-office success but cultural impact. His characters are instantly recognizable. His lines are quoted decades later. His films defined the action genre of the 1980s and 1990s. And through it all, he embraced his uniqueness rather than conforming.

It all started with Conan the Barbarian. Still, a great film if you haven’t seen it. He had the perfect physique for the role after his years of bodybuilding. I only saw this many years after seeing his other films. It still resonated.

Here’s to Arnold Shwarzeneggar.. what an actor.

The Outlaw King Review: A Gripping Tale of Scottish Independence

There’s something about medieval Scots fighting the English that warms the heart. “Freedom” sounds great, but any reason to fight the old enemy is good enough in truth. Well, from a film perspective. I love English people, really. So when I saw that this was available on Netflix, I pressed play.

The Outlaw King is an electrifying and emotionally resonant historical epic set in 1304 that brings Robert the Bruce’s story to life with striking authenticity and intensity. Directed by David Mackenzie and led by a commanding performance from Chris Pine, this film stands as a gripping portrayal of Scotland’s fight for independence — raw, human, and deeply inspiring.

From the very first frame, the film immerses viewers in the harsh, mud-soaked reality of medieval warfare. Unlike glossy historical dramas, The Outlaw King embraces realism. It also predates the CGI nonsense plaguing modern films. The battle sequences are visceral and unflinching, especially the climactic confrontation at the Battle of Loudoun Hill, which is staged with breathtaking choreography and tension. The long, chaotic tracking shots during combat create a sense of immediacy that makes you feel as if you’re right there on the battlefield.

Chris Pine delivers one of the strongest performances of his career. His portrayal of Robert the Bruce is layered and compelling — not a flawless hero, but a determined and conflicted leader who grows into his destiny. Pine captures the vulnerability, resolve, and quiet intensity of a man who risks everything for freedom. His Scottish accent is impressive, and his physical commitment to the role adds authenticity.

The supporting cast is equally strong, particularly Florence Pugh as Elizabeth de Burgh. Pugh brings intelligence and emotional weight to her role, portraying a woman whose strength matches the film’s epic scope. The chemistry between her and Pine adds heart to a story otherwise dominated by political tension and warfare.

Visually, the film is stunning. The rugged Scottish landscapes — sweeping highlands, mist-covered hills, and medieval castles — are captured with moody cinematography that enhances both the beauty and brutality of the setting. The natural lighting and muted color palette reinforce the grounded tone, making everything feel lived-in and historically authentic.

What truly sets The Outlaw King apart is its focus on resilience and leadership. Rather than romanticizing rebellion, the film shows the cost of resistance — betrayal, loss, hardship — and makes Robert’s eventual victories feel earned. It’s a story about persistence in the face of overwhelming odds, and it resonates far beyond its historical setting.

For fans of historical dramas, war epics, or character-driven storytelling, The Outlaw King is a must-watch. It’s bold, intense, and emotionally stirring — a film that honors its history while delivering cinematic excitement. A powerful reminder that freedom is rarely won without sacrifice.

The one drawback to the film, unlike the classic Braveheart, this feels like a war between nobles, the top tier in each country. It doesn’t feel to me, watching it, that this is a battle of your average Scot.

For that reason, it gets three stars out of five from me.

Unforgettable Performances: Jodie Foster’s Best Roles

My earliest memory of watching Jodie Foster was as Clarice Starling, an FBI trainee in one of my favorite films of all time – The Silence of the Lambs. Her acting, and that of Anthony Hopkins, was unforgettable. In particular, the conversations between Clarice and Dr. Hannibal Lecter.

For many years, I had thought that was her breakout role. But I was wrong.

Foster first stunned audiences with her haunting performance in Taxi Driver, directed by Martin Scorsese, as a child prostitute. At just 14 years old, she delivered a performance of extraordinary emotional intelligence and control, earning an Academy Award nomination. It was immediately clear she was not a typical child actor but a serious dramatic force. Set in a decaying New York City following the Vietnam War, it stars Robert De Niro as veteran Marine and taxi driver Travis Bickle, whose mental state deteriorates as he works nights in the city.

Jodie Foster has since built one of the most intelligent, fearless, and enduring careers in modern cinema. From child prodigy to two-time Academy Award winner to respected director, her body of work reflects an artist who consistently chooses depth over glamour and complexity over cliché.

Throughout the 1980s and 1990s, Foster solidified her reputation for portraying fiercely intelligent, resilient women. Her Oscar-winning role in The Accused showcased her extraordinary courage and vulnerability, anchoring a difficult, socially significant story with nuance and dignity. She followed that triumph with perhaps her most iconic performance as Clarice Starling in the previously mentioned The Silence of the Lambs.

What distinguishes Foster’s career is her commitment to intelligence—both her own and that of her audience. In films like Contact, directed by Robert Zemeckis, she brought emotional gravity to philosophical science fiction, grounding big ideas in human vulnerability. Even in high-concept thrillers such as Panic Room, she elevated genre material through subtle character work and psychological realism.

Beyond acting, Foster has also proven herself an accomplished director. With films like Little Man Tate and The Beaver, she demonstrated a thoughtful, character-driven approach behind the camera, often exploring themes of identity, intelligence, and emotional isolation—subjects that have consistently fascinated her throughout her career.

Another hallmark of Foster’s legacy is longevity. The most recent work I’ve seen her in was the fourth season of True Detective. It is set in the fictional town of Ennis, Alaska, north of the Arctic Circle, during polar night. It follows the investigation of the disappearance of eight men from a research station. The season stars Jodie Foster and Kali Reis as Detectives Liz Danvers and Evangeline Navarro.

Foster’s character is central to each episode. Despite her increasing age, the inner beauty shines through in a determined, eerie performance.

Lets hope she keeps going for another few decades.

M3GAN 2.0: Sequel Analysis and Performances

So, the other film I watched on a very busy Sunday was this gem, M3ghan 2.0. I have to be honest, I haven’t seen the original, but it looked like it would be worth watching. M3GAN 2.0 is a 2025 American science fiction action film written and directed by Gerard Johnstone from a story he co-wrote with Akela Cooper. A sequel to the 2022 film M3GAN and the second installment in the M3GAN franchise, the film stars Allison Williams, Violet McGraw, Ivanna Sakhno, and Jemaine Clement, with Amie Donald physically portraying M3GAN while Jenna Davis voices the character. Jason Blum and James Wan return as producers through their respective Blumhouse Productions and Atomic Monster.

What immediately stands out is how the film deals with its central ideas about artificial intelligence, control, and human dependence on technology. M3GAN is no longer just a creepy novelty; she’s a fully realized presence whose intelligence, adaptability, and unsettling logic drive the story forward. The screenplay smartly plays with shifting alliances and moral ambiguity, making the audience constantly reassess whether M3GAN is purely a villain—or something more complicated and unsettling than that.

U.S. Army colonel Sattler, head of a secret branch of the Pentagon specializing in new technologies, gives a demonstration of AMELIA,[a] an android designed for infiltration and assassination missions and built using technology copied from the original M3GAN. During her mission, however, AMELIA reveals to Sattler that she is self-aware and escapes from his control.

In a strange twist, M3ghan, who survived by making a backup in a smart home from the happenings of the first film. becomes the best hope of stopping her. This reminded me of the Terminator franchise and the idea that one could outgrow one’s original programming.

The performances remain a strong point. Allison Williams brings added emotional weight and maturity to her role, reflecting a character shaped by past trauma and hard-earned lessons. Violet McGraw continues to impress, grounding the story with genuine emotional stakes. And M3GAN herself—through a blend of physical performance, voice work, and effects—is sharper than ever: funny, menacing, and oddly charismatic in a way few horror icons manage.

Stylistically, M3GAN 2.0 is slick and energetic. The action sequences are confidently staged, the pacing rarely drags, and the film knows exactly when to lean into camp and when to pull back for tension. It embraces its identity unapologetically, delivering moments that are thrilling, darkly funny, and undeniably crowd-pleasing.

Four stars out of five from me.

Exploring Humanity in _The Great Flood_: A Film Review

One of the best things about Netflix is that you get to watch films and documentaries from all over the world. One such film is The Great Flood from South Korea. It was co-written and directed by Kim Byung-woo.

An-na, an AI researcher and recent widow, played by Kim-Da-mi, wakes in her apartment to find floodwater rising in the thirty-floor complex. With her six-year-old son Ja-in, she attempts to reach safety.

However, they are no ordinary mother and child. The child is a robot designed to experience emotion. This is critical to the whole film. An asteroid has hit, and human extinction is imminent. World governments knew what was going to happen and funded secret efforts to survive, including a space station and research into the creation of engineered human bodies and consciousness. An-na’s employer is also revealed to be involved in these projects, putting her and her child central to humanity’s future.

What stands out most is the film’s balance between scale and humanity. While the flood itself is rendered with striking visual power—ominous skies, rising waters, and carefully staged moments of chaos—the story never loses sight of the people caught within it. The narrative lingers on personal choices, moral dilemmas, and quiet acts of courage, allowing the disaster to feel not just catastrophic, but deeply personal. This focus gives the film an emotional weight that elevates it beyond a standard disaster movie.

The performances are uniformly strong, grounded, and convincing. Rather than leaning into melodrama, the actors bring restraint and authenticity, making fear, grief, and resilience feel earned. Small gestures and silences often speak louder than dialogue, and those understated moments are some of the film’s most powerful.

Technically, The Great Flood is impressively crafted. The cinematography captures both the beauty and menace of nature, using light, color, and movement to heighten tension. The sound design is particularly effective—the rush of water, distant alarms, and sudden quiet all work together to create a visceral experience that keeps the audience on edge. The pacing is deliberate, allowing suspense to build naturally while still delivering moments of urgency and release.

Ultimately, The Great Flood is a film about survival in the broadest sense: not just surviving a natural catastrophe, but preserving compassion, responsibility, and hope when everything familiar is threatened.

If nothing else, it is a great story. With AI coming to the forefront of our lives, I expect more films of this nature in the future. Four out of five stars from me.

Why You Need to Watch The Rip Right Now!

My dear readers, I have an urgent message for you. Stop whatever you are doing, subscribe to Netflix or a dodgy box, and watch The Rip. Quite simply, it is that good. An easy five stars out of five, and the best gangster type film I’ve seen in years.

The Rip is a 2026 American action thriller film written and directed by Joe Carnahan, who developed the story with Michael McGrale. The film stars Matt Damon and Ben Affleck as police officers within the narcotics unit of the Miami-Dade Police Department. They give stellar performances. It also stars Steven Yeun, Teyana Taylor, Sasha Calle, Catalina Sandino Moreno, Scott Adkins, and Kyle Chandler.

It is inspired by the true story of Miami-Dade County Sheriff Chris Casiano. This film tells the story of a group of police officers who, during a raid on a hidden cash operation, find their trust broken down as team members suspect each other of trying to steal a large sum of cash.

The Rip is a gripping, confidently made film that lingers long after the credits roll. From its opening moments, it establishes a tense, immersive atmosphere and never lets go, pulling the viewer into a story that feels both intimate and unsettling. The film’s greatest strength lies in how controlled and purposeful it is—every scene, every beat, feels intentional.

The performances are a standout across the board. The cast delivers raw, believable work that grounds the film’s more intense moments in genuine emotion. Rather than relying on exaggerated reactions, The Rip allows its characters to unravel in subtle, human ways, making their choices and consequences feel painfully real. This emotional restraint makes the film’s most powerful moments hit even harder.

Visually, The Rip is striking without being showy. The cinematography uses framing, lighting, and movement to reinforce the story’s themes, often communicating more through silence and composition than dialogue ever could. The film has a strong sense of place, and the environment itself becomes part of the storytelling, heightening tension and reinforcing the characters’ inner turmoil.

It is all brought to a well-thought-out and masterful conclusion. No need to thank me. Start Netflixing.

Nuremberg (2025): A Cinematic Exploration of Justice

Not for the faint-hearted, this film is currently being shown on Sky Movies. Nuremberg (2025) is a compelling and meticulously crafted film that succeeds both as a historical drama and as a deeply human exploration of justice, morality, and responsibility. From its opening moments to its final, reflective scenes, the film commands attention with quiet confidence and emotional weight.

One of the film’s greatest strengths is its restrained yet powerful storytelling. Rather than relying on spectacle or melodrama, Nuremberg allows tension to build through dialogue, performance, and ethical confrontation. The screenplay is intelligent and precise, presenting complex legal and moral questions in a way that feels accessible without ever being simplistic. The pacing is deliberate, giving viewers time to absorb the gravity of the events while remaining consistently engaging.

Nuremberg is a 2025 American psychological thriller historical drama film written, co-produced, and directed by James Vanderbilt. Based on the 2013 book The Nazi and the Psychiatrist by Jack El-Hai, the film follows U.S. Army psychiatrist Douglas Kelley (Rami Malek) seeking to carry out an assignment to investigate the personalities and monitor the mental status of Hermann Göring (Russell Crowe) and other high-ranking Nazis in preparation for and during the Nuremberg trials. Leo Woodall, John Slattery, Mark O’Brien, Colin Hanks, Wrenn Schmidt, Lydia Peckham, Richard E. Grant, and Michael Shannon have supporting roles in the film.

Russell Crowe, in particular, gives a breathtaking performance as Hermann Göring. The back and forth of his testimony is the central plank of the film.

Visually, Nuremberg (2025) is striking in its understatement. The cinematography favors muted tones and carefully composed frames, reinforcing the somber atmosphere without feeling oppressive. Production design is detailed and immersive, effectively transporting the audience to the post-war setting while maintaining a grounded, realistic feel. The score is used sparingly but effectively, enhancing emotional moments without overwhelming them.

What truly elevates the film is its thematic depth. Nuremberg does not simply recount historical events—it invites reflection on accountability, the rule of law, and the enduring consequences of moral choices. The film resonates strongly in a modern context, reminding viewers why truth, justice, and ethical responsibility remain essential values. Its relevance feels intentional and timely, adding an extra layer of significance to the viewing experience.

In the end, Nuremberg (2025) stands out as a thoughtful, mature, and deeply respectful film. It is not only an important historical portrayal but also a gripping cinematic experience that lingers long after the credits roll. Powerful without being preachy and emotional without being manipulative, it is a film that rewards careful attention and thoughtful reflection. Highly recommended for audiences seeking intelligent, meaningful cinema.

The film gets five stars out of five from me. Beware, there are some horrific images from the concentration camps in the film.

Have you seen it? Let me know in the comments.

Exploring The Life of Chuck: A Review of a Fantasy Drama

Hi, my readers, I hope you are having a good weekend. This is a different kind of film I watched recently that I found quite entertaining. And maybe you’ll like it too.

The Life of Chuck is a 2024 American fantasy drama film written for the screen, co-produced, edited, and directed by Mike Flanagan. It is based on the 2020 novella of the same name by Stephen King. The film stars Tom Hiddleston, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Karen Gillan, Mia Sara, Carl Lumbly, Benjamin Pajak, Jacob Tremblay, and Mark Hamill, with narration by Nick Offerman.

The film’s plot follows the formative moments in the life of Charles “Chuck” Krantz, chronicled in reverse chronological order, from his death, depicted as the end of the universe, to his childhood.

The film’s greatest strength is its unconventional narrative design. The story unfolds like a memory being gently rewound, each chapter revealing not only new information but also new emotional context. What initially feels mysterious and even abstract gradually becomes intimate and profoundly relatable. The structure isn’t a gimmick—it reinforces the film’s central idea that every life, no matter how ordinary it seems from the outside, contains multitudes.

There are chapters to the film. The first is Act 3, Thanks, Chuck

Chuck mostly doesn’t appear in this Act. Middle school teacher Marty Anderson notes unusual things happening around the world, from natural disasters to the worldwide loss of the Internet. Several billboards and advertisements popping up everywhere display a picture of an accountant named Charles “Chuck” Krantz, accompanied by the words “Charles Krantz: 39 Great Years! Thanks, Chuck!” Marty’s ex-wife, Felicia Gordon, calls him, and they ponder if the end of the universe is upon them. Marty describes Carl Sagan’s Cosmic Calendar, a method to visualise the age of the universe in a single calendar year. Both of them begin seeing more disasters and supernatural occurrences.

After losing telephone service and electricity, Marty goes to Felicia’s home so they can stay with one another in the universe’s final moments, watching as the stars vanish one by one. The end of the universe is revealed to be connected to 39-year-old Chuck, who is bedridden in a hospital, dying from a brain tumor. He is accompanied by his wife, Ginny, and his son Brian. Chuck passes away as Ginny tells him, “39 great years. Thanks, Chuck. Meanwhile, Marty tells Felicia, “I love you,” just as the universe abruptly ends.

You realize that what you have been watching is the destruction of Chuck’s mind.

The next two Acts deal with important moments in Chuck’s life, both sorrowful and joyful. By the end, you realize that Chuck was no boring accountant, but lived a full life. Even if he died at just 39 years of age.

I give it four stars out of five. Now, stop wasting your life, and go watch some TV!

Documentary Review: I’m Chevy Chase and You’re Not

Those of my readers around in the eighties will probably remember Chevy Chase. I remembered him from comedic films from the time period, but it had been many years since I even thought of him.

So, I said I’d give this documentary film a try. Its name is “I’m Chevy Chase and You’re Not.” From the start, it becomes clear that his bad reputation as a coworker will be a big focus, as well as his past drug abuse.

The film does an excellent job of reminding you just how seismic Chase’s impact on comedy really was. Saturday Night Live doesn’t just get a nod—it gets a victory lap. Watching early clips of Gerald Ford tumbling down stairs and Chase anchoring Weekend Update is like seeing comedy history being invented in real time, mostly held together with duct tape and confidence. The documentary smartly lets these moments breathe, trusting the material to remind you why Chase was, for a time, the funniest man in America.

Then come the movies, and oh, what a parade it is. Caddyshack, Fletch, National Lampoon’s Vacation—the documentary rolls through them like a greatest-hits album where every track is either iconic or inexplicably quotable. There’s a genuine joy in revisiting how Chase perfected the art of the smug, clueless, yet weirdly lovable leading man. His comic persona—equal parts charm and chaos—gets the credit it deserves as a blueprint for generations of comedians who followed.

But then there are the drugs. And he did a lot. And he could be mean. The drug abuse, his comedy, and this meanness all likely have one source – an abusive mother. He developed it as a coping mechanism. It is one he still uses as he makes jokes to deflect difficult or awkward moments, even in his eighties. Still, even his meanness comes off as him being a bit of a rascal.

When the stories get messy. You come away with the sense that Chase’s imperfections didn’t cancel out his contributions—they complicated them, humanized them, and, strangely, made his successes even more impressive.

By the end, the documentary feels less like a verdict and more like a well-earned, slightly crooked standing ovation. It celebrates a man who made millions of people laugh, sometimes by falling down, sometimes by being the joke, and sometimes by being in on it all along.

It gets four out of five stars from me.

If you’ve seen it, what did you think?

Review of the Film 28 Years Later

Hi, ladies and gentlemen. Yes, I’m still on my Christmas holidays. That is probably why you are hearing so much from me at the moment. On the plus side, I watched this film earlier and thought I’d share my thoughts.

For those who don’t love zombies as much as I (weirdos), this is a sequel to the iconic film 28 Days Later. A truly great film.

The premise in this universe is that in 2002, animal activists infiltrate a top-secret laboratory of scientists to release animals, and in the process unknowingly release chimpanzees infected with a pathogen, resulting in a rapid outbreak. The scientists were studying a highly contagious and powerful disease named the Rage Virus. This virus spreads throughout the UK, turning much of its population into de facto zombies.  Great stuff, I know.

Fortunately, it’s only the UK that has been affected (not overly worrisome), and it is in quarantine. This is a bit more serious than leaving the EU.

Anyways, this film starts with lots of kids in a room watching the Teletubbies, a perfect way to tell us the time period. Except for one lucky survivor, all the kids get killed. I almost shed a tear, seriously.

The film then jumps forward to the present. The movie understands that the real horror of an apocalypse isn’t just the chaos—it’s the long-term admin. Systems are breaking down. People are adapting in weird ways, going all medieval and shit. Societies are rebuilding themselves with duct tape and unresolved trauma.

At the heart of the film is a son’s love for his mother. It was all going so well, till then. She’s very sick, and the son thinks a doctor is a solution. It gives them a reason to go on a journey, but the kid seems happy to risk everything on blind luck. It’s a major weakness for the film, as well as the lack of understanding of the father.

They should have continued the film as it started – the father-son relationship.

Another criticism is that many of the scenes didn’t look apocalyptic. Too few trees, the grass was too short, and the roads’ surface too perfect. 28 years later, my ass. I expect more from a film.

For those reasons, it’s three stars from me.

Have you seen it? Why not message and let me know?